Michelle Obama's Latest "Family Values" Swipe

"Family Values" is one of those political phrases that can't ever really be divorced from its earlier context and meaning. I'm sure that any one who lived through the 90's can't hear the phrase without remembering it as a Republican battle-cry used against the Clintons and the Democratic Party. It was a rhetorical weapon that signified opposition to liberal values such as gender equality and abortion rights. And it was used to attack the Clintons during the Ken Starr investigation and impeachment.

So why would Michelle Obama refer to "family values" tonight on Colbert?

It's not the first time the phrase has come up during the 2008 campaign:

Mitt Romney today sharply criticized the "family values" of Hillary Clinton and her husband, recalling Bill Clinton's affair with a White House intern that led to an impeachment battle.

Answering a question from a woman who asked him how the president can promote family values, Romney wasted no time in bringing up the Clintons.

"There's no question that one of the ways that you help instill family values is by having the White House be a place that demonstrates that," Romney said. "So I think that during the last Clinton presidency, the White House did not demonstrate that in a way that was helpful for our nation's culture."

Tonight on Colbert, Michelle Obama explained why women would vote for Senator Obama and not Clinton: "Many women like myself who are independent, strong, focused, who care about family values..."

The connotation is unavoidable, especially since Michelle used it when contrasting her husband with Hillary Clinton. And she's done it before. Here's Michelle Obama in Iowa:

Part of what we want to do as a family...is to model what it means to have family values in this country and we haven't seen that for a long time...one of the most important things that we need to know about the next President of the United States is, is he somebody that shares our values? Is he somebody that respects family? Is he a good and decent person? So our view was that, if you can't run your own house, you certainly can't run the White House.

This is ugly politics. Invoking a loaded Republican catch-phrase in this manner has no place in a contest between Democrats. Shame on you, Michelle.



Display:


This is really a stretch. (2.00 / 2)

"Family values" is not a dirty word; we should reclaim it for what it really is.

A friend of mine who, alone with a same-sex partner, adopted five at-risk kids.  He loves to talk about his family values.  And I respect them.

Michelle didn't say anything even slightly negative about Clinton.  


by OaktownDad on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 05:45:45 AM EST

She was calling in to question (1.80 / 5)

the Clinton's family values and it was also a sexist remark claiming that Clinton can not run the white house because her husband cheated on her.  That is really what it boils down to.


For Obama it now becomes: Faith, hope and CHANGE! And the greatest of these is Change!
by TeresaInPa on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 08:12:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: She was calling in to question (2.00 / 2)

This is patently ridiculous. In fact, its pretty paranoid thinking.


by upstate girl on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 08:14:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: She was calling in to question (2.00 / 1)

How could "If you can't run your house, how can you run the White House" get any more clear? It seems like the only one stretching is you.


Hillary supporter for Barack Obama in 2008
by zcflint05 on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 09:55:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: She was calling in to question (2.00 / 1)

That's not the comment you're trying to turn into something that it completely isn't. If you want to rail on her for that comment, start your own diary about it (probably one of dozens that have already been posted months ago). You should maybe read the diary before you comment.


by upstate girl on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 10:03:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: She was calling in to question (1.20 / 5)

I dunno. If she's running on experience from the Clinton years, but didn't know what was going on under the Oval Office desk...


by Democratic Unity on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 08:14:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: She was calling in to question (2.00 / 1)

Your translating it that way tells me that's what you think. It's a very big stretch.


by Becky G on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 09:34:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: She was calling in to question (2.00 / 1)

Hahahaha. I saw the episode and you're just plain making shit up.


My candidate lost fair and square. So did yours. Get over it and let's kick McSame's ass!
by RLMcCauley on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 09:53:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Yikes (none / 0)

I didn't hear these comments but it certainly brings back memories. It was Dan Quayle's only 'send the stupid kid out to say something and see how it resounds before BushI said it and made himself look foolish' that apparently resounded. 'Family Values' was the only one that stuck and they attacked single mothers and anyone who wasn't a 'traditional' family as wrong and immoral and God forbid a woman should have a baby out of wedlock without being flogged and have her baby taken away.

I swear the more I hear of these two the more they sound like BushII....stay out of my house!! Stay out of my family!! Keep your moral values to yourself I think mine are better than yours and always have been. I don't see you MO as a role model for anything and if you and BO want to play role model then go play somewhere else. We've had over 7 years of the same identical rantings in the Bush WH that you are offering in Iowa. Role models for family values...what the h***? Is this not condescending too?

Sorry I'm ranting but MO take your particular kind of family values and role models and shove them. Did Barack's mother not have family values because she had a baby with a married man out of wedlock and then married and divorced another man? Seems to me that she did a lot more with her life than you have Michelle- have a little mother in law problem? She's dead-probably hard to compete with a dead woman.


by Justwords on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 05:50:04 AM EST

Re: Yikes (none / 0)

She said two words: "family values."

Your implication that she said anything about who's a good mother and all that other bullshit you threw out is just that...bullshit.  Saying you aspire to being good and strong for your family isn't a bad thing, so take whatever values YOU have that are in contrast with those and shove them yourself.

What a joke all this anti-Obama hate is.  


Donate to Obama, Today!
by freedom78 on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 10:46:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I saw her appearance on Colbert (2.00 / 3)

and I didn't think what she said was a big deal at all.


by puma on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 06:26:44 AM EST

FamilyValues 'R Us (2.00 / 5)

It's absolutely the right thing to say and she needs to say it every time she opens her mouth. Democrats need to own family values this time around.


by wayne204 on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 06:35:54 AM EST

didn't see a swipe (2.00 / 3)

You have to really try hard to see a "swipe" in her comment on Colbert tonight. Does every time Senator Clinton attribute positive qualities to herself mean she's taking a swipe at anyone else? Is Michelle Obama not allowed to talk about herself in positive terms?


by upstate girl on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 06:40:52 AM EST

Not a swipe (2.00 / 3)

In case you haven't been listening to stump speeches, Senator Obama and his wife have been pretty consistant about addressing the need to strengthen families. Teen pregnancy, better early education for children, STD's and HIV, health care - all of these are issues of importance to families.  "Values" do need to be addressed - not just by the religious right.  

I didn't see this as a swipe against Senator Clinton , who also makes the same arguements.  I think she and Senator Obama are very much in accord in this respect.  

Why should Repubs have a lock on this?  Family values does NOT mean being anti-choice.  For me - a woman's right to choose is an essential family value.  


Anthropologists for human diversity; opposing McCain perversity
by NeciVelez on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 07:09:47 AM EST

Re: Michelle Obama's Latest "Fa (2.00 / 3)

We want a President that can learn quickly.

McCain certainly doesn't have a clue. His excuse is that he is too old.

Obama is outmaneurvering Hillary, and his ability to do so is improving weekly.

That makes him the best candidate. If he is smart enough to rip Hillary, a consummate insider, to shreds then he is smart enough to get something done as President.


A former hillary supporter.
by Cristalgirl on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 07:31:53 AM EST

oh please (2.00 / 2)

I swear some of you Hillary supporters are the equivalent of Portuguese soccer players.

Michelle Obama can't say "family values" without someone taking a flagrant dive to draw a red card.


by smoothmedia on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 07:47:34 AM EST

Re: oh please (2.00 / 1)

Wow.  That is an awesome analogy.  Right down to the part where after a while the goal becomes not trying to win the game, but rather to draw as many cards as possible to make players sit out the next game.  


by bawbie on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 08:36:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Michelle (1.66 / 3)

Michelle Obama will make sure that Obama will lose the general election if he's the nominee. Both of them have the condescending sanctimony that voters strongly dislike.


No longer a Democrat, now proudly an independent voter!
by Ga6thDem on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 08:30:47 AM EST

Re: Michelle (2.00 / 1)

You must have missed the recent Washington Post/ABC national poll, where he's outperforming both Clinton and McCain nationally, and 61% of Democrats believe he's more electable.

Please stop transferring your own personal dislike onto the rest of the voting populace without some kind of proof.


by upstate girl on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 08:37:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Michelle (2.00 / 4)

Just because Democrats believe he's electable doesn't mean he is. Did you see the poll that said that the majority of Americans don't like his elitist attitude. It seems that's more relevant to the winning than just what democrats think. Elitist Liberals never win elections. See Kerry, John, Dukakis, Michael, and McGovern, George. I'm sure that the majority of Dems thought that they were electable too right? Sure they did or they wouldn't have nominated them.

Obama doesn't have a winning coalition. A coalition comprised of AA's and upper income whites is the same one that McGovern and Dukakis had and it leads to a landslide. Demographics tell you much more than polls do at this point.


No longer a Democrat, now proudly an independent voter!
by Ga6thDem on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 08:43:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Michelle (none / 0)

Actually, I haven't. Would you care to link to it? The poll I'm looking at is a national matchup, not just in PA (which is after all only one of 50 states).

The ABC/WaPo poll also shows Obama leading higher than either Clinton or McCain among all surveyed (not just Democrats). The numbers don't hold in your favor.


by upstate girl on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 08:46:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Michelle (2.00 / 1)

Sorry but you're not looking at the underlying demographics in that poll. You're only looking at the top line number and if their turnout model is flawed it could be off by huge amounts.

The largest swing voting bloc in this country is working class catholics. Obama does extremely bad with those.


No longer a Democrat, now proudly an independent voter!
by Ga6thDem on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 08:52:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Michelle (2.00 / 1)

Again, do you have anything to back that up? I find it interesting that you're ignoring a huge sample base poll conducted with such detail and pinning Obama's eventual defeat on working class catholics.


by upstate girl on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 09:03:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Michelle (1.50 / 2)

Do you realize that Kerry lost working class catholics? Do you know electoral history in this country? Apparently not.


No longer a Democrat, now proudly an independent voter!
by Ga6thDem on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 09:18:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Michelle (2.00 / 1)

If its that common knowledge, providing a link shouldn't be hard for you then. And you still haven't explained what working class Catholics have to do in this election cycle.


by upstate girl on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 09:51:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Michelle (none / 0)

Google for the exit polls for 2004. It's easy.


No longer a Democrat, now proudly an independent voter!
by Ga6thDem on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 05:35:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Michelle (1.00 / 1)

Weird how you weren't given a link.

Even weirder than Chelsea working for a scummy hedge-fund and Jenna writing a book about HIV.


My candidate lost fair and square. So did yours. Get over it and let's kick McSame's ass!
by RLMcCauley on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 09:51:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Michelle (none / 0)

Poor condescending Obamas, you really wish they would know their place, don't you?


"I hope the two wings of the Democratic Party may flap together." - William Jennings Bryan
by pinche tejano on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 10:41:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Michelle Obama's Latest (2.00 / 1)

Wow! Now Democrats can't say they are a family values candidate?  I hope she says that over and over from now till the election. It says a lot that you immediately see that as a swipe at Clinton. In you mind Clinton is a far cry from a family values candidate, and you assume most viewers will see it that way also.


by Becky G on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 09:32:40 AM EST

The amazing thing (2.00 / 1)

It was actually a compliment to Clinton supporters.

Colbert asked her why, if she's a successful, independant woman, she's not supporting Clinton instead of Obama.

She went on to explain that there are plenty of Clinton's core demographic... who view family values as important as well, that support Obama.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 09:54:12 AM EST

Michelle Obama = Leave the party (none / 0)

I think it's patently hilarious that those that consider themselves "Democrats" and "feminists" supporting trashing a woman based on her husband cheating on her. I certainly don't understand how anyone could NOT slam someone for saying "If she can't run her house, She can't run the White House", no matter what party they are a part of.

Michelle Obama basically said, "Well, if your husband cheats on you, you can't be President, HILLARY". Don't try to tell me differently because there's no way she could be referring to anything else. Anyone who tries to explain away her comments is pretty putrid to me, especally since the Democratic Party has made a livelihood of standing up for women, among others. It's shameful that we have someone like her attempting to represent Democrats on a national level.


Hillary supporter for Barack Obama in 2008
by zcflint05 on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 09:59:03 AM EST

Re: Michelle Obama's Latest " (none / 0)

I thought it was a fair comment considering how Hillary uses Rove talking pts to go after Obama with.  Michelle did not refer to the Clintons at all.  It could have been anyone she is referring to.  The dems are going to have talk about family values because the repugs will.


by Spanky on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 10:26:18 AM EST

I don't have much confidence (2.00 / 1)

in the values of a family that listens to Rev. Wright for 20+ years.


by georgiapeach on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 10:32:11 AM EST

Rev. Wright.... (2.00 / 1)

is the adopted crazy uncle. In the eyes of Obama, he's family and you can't walk away from family :D


by soyousay on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 10:39:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Michelle Obama's "Family Values" Swipe (none / 0)

Unbelievable.

For Michelle to insinuate that Hillary would make a poor president because her husband cheated on her.  

Again, no mystery about what she ways saying:

"So our view was that, if you can't run your own house, you certainly can't run the White House."

What do we know of Barack's fidelity?  I suppose it's a relevant question now that Michelle has raised the comparison.  


2004 swing state margins: PA-2%, OH-2%, IA-1%, WI-0.5%, MI-3%, FL-5%, NM-1%; Alienating 50% of the party is a luxury we can't afford.
by BPK80 on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 10:32:37 AM EST

WTF?!?! (2.00 / 1)

Are the Obama's only allowed to talk about things on which they and the Clintons are 100% identical?  I think family values and personal responsibility have been an important, albeit overlooked, aspect of Obama's campaign.  

If Michelle's comments about her belief in family values make the Clintons look bad in contrast, it's because the Clintons have been failures in this area.  

But she wasn't talking about the Clintons.  She was talking about the Obamas and people who support them.  


Donate to Obama, Today!
by freedom78 on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 10:44:14 AM EST

Loved the clip. (none / 0)

I fell asleep and missed her on The Colbert Report.  She's a classy lady and as always after hearing her speak, I applauded with the audience.  She'll make a great First Lady.


Swish. Nothing but net.
by GFORD on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 10:44:35 AM EST

Re: Michelle Obama's Latest (none / 0)

We Must Denounce Family Values!

When you sit back and think about this diary it is rather silly.

A. 'Family Values' is not a phrased owned by those who attacked Bill Clinton.

B. To say one thinks Family Values are important in only an attack on the Clintons if you find their values lackluster.

C. Do we really want to be the non-Family Values party?


Bring Back MyDD - Just say No to Rec'ing Candidate Diaries.
by CardBoard on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 11:26:47 AM EST

Re: Michelle Obama's Latest "Family Values (none / 0)

The Clinton's family values, or lack of them notwithstanding,this is much ado about nothing.
Family values transcend party lines.
"Beauty, more than bitterness, makes the heart break." Sara Teasdale
by april34fff on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 11:40:42 AM EST

Re: Michelle Obama's Latest "Family (none / 0)

FAMILY VALUESGATE!


"Beauty, more than bitterness, makes the heart break." Sara Teasdale
by april34fff on Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 11:48:08 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.